Solution
Planning began with an initial weeklong charrette led by Burns & McDonnell and continued over the next several years with multiple planning meetings. This preliminary work included a variety of interested parties, including the Air Force — and its Air Force Logistics Command, Air Force Materiel Command, Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), and the 72nd Air Base Wing at Tinker AFB — the USACE Tulsa District and the Burns & McDonnell design team. Biweekly teleconferences with Air Force representatives were conducted throughout the design process to coordinate and review action items. These teleconferences were critical to developing the design to mitigate potential risks for this mission-critical program.
Based on this highly detailed, committed approach to the planning process, USACE Tulsa District selected Burns & McDonnell to provide comprehensive architectural/engineering design services for this $142 million hangar. The overall scope of work included design of the two-bay depot maintenance hangar, a mechanical systems building, major utilities and airfield pavement. This project necessitated proactive risk management to plan for extensive phasing with the multiple contractors on-site. Workflows were carefully synchronized to allow for minimal disruptions for continuous operations.
Read The Case Study
Solution
Planning began with an initial weeklong charrette led by Burns & McDonnell and continued over the next several years with multiple planning meetings. This preliminary work included a variety of interested parties, including the Air Force — and its Air Force Logistics Command, Air Force Materiel Command, Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), and the 72nd Air Base Wing at Tinker AFB — the USACE Tulsa District and the Burns & McDonnell design team. Biweekly teleconferences with Air Force representatives were conducted throughout the design process to coordinate and review action items. These teleconferences were critical to developing the design to mitigate potential risks for this mission-critical program.
Based on this highly detailed, committed approach to the planning process, USACE Tulsa District selected Burns & McDonnell to provide comprehensive architectural/engineering design services for this $142 million hangar. The overall scope of work included design of the two-bay depot maintenance hangar, a mechanical systems building, major utilities and airfield pavement. This project required proactive risk management to plan for extensive phasing with the multiple contractors on-site. Workflows were carefully synchronized to allow for minimal disruptions for continuous operations.
Shortly before the Issued for Construction (IFC) drawings were due to be submitted, AFCEC requested that Burns & McDonnell redesign a significant portion of the fire protection system to satisfy new requirements. Having supported initial development of these Air Force requirements, the Burns & McDonnell team had the knowledge needed to promptly execute a redesign. Burns & McDonnell worked with the USACE Tulsa District to overcome a challenging construction market and achieve a successful award, with value engineering work on this project identifying approximately $4 million in savings.
Results
The project was successfully awarded, construction was completed and the hangar is currently operational. The completed hangar stands approximately 44 feet high over the wings of the aircraft and approximately 78 feet high over the tail and fuselage section. The hangar includes 12 telescoping platforms designed to reach all areas of the KC-46A aircraft; also included are eight work platform lifts, as well as new bridge cranes and fall protection devices. It features a pair of horizontal sliding hangar doors with a clear-height opening of 65 feet and a clear-width opening of 177 feet.
The hangar was designed pursuant to UFC 1-200-02 and achieved LEED Silver certification, with over 60% of construction waste successfully diverted from the landfill, 24% of building products manufactured with recovered materials and whole-building energy modeling projected at 45.8% energy efficiency compared to the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline. Our team worked with the local base civil engineer and user groups to design a hangar that recirculates 80% of the airflow in paint mode, greatly reducing first cost and energy usage to achieve LEED Silver certification.
