Position resilience as central to the passenger experience. The case for resilient infrastructure goes beyond weather and budgets. It’s also the backbone to safe, reliable airport operations. When systems fail, they can halt operations — disrupting flights, stranding passengers and eroding public trust. In today’s airport environment, that level of risk is unacceptable. You can’t improve the passenger experience while stuck in reactive maintenance mode.
Design beyond what today’s codes prescribe. Building codes are based on historical data that no longer reflects present-day realities. A 500-year flood may now hit every 50 years. Wildfires are more frequent and intense. The climate, in short, is shifting faster than infrastructure can adapt, and airports are now facing disruptions they weren’t built to handle. Accounting for these evolving risks through more resilient design can drive up initial project costs. But a $20 million project is no bargain if it’s out of service in five years or needs $5 million a year in maintenance — especially when a $30 million alternative could avoid both the risk and recurring expense.
Use data to build support. Convincing others to push beyond the minimum takes leadership, especially when developers and public agencies are under pressure to cut costs. Making the case for stronger materials, redundant systems, and more durable solutions requires solid data and a commitment to long-term value over short-term savings. In practice, resilient systems often pay for themselves. Whether it’s upgrading pavement to accommodate larger aircraft loads or building systems that can withstand more extreme environmental conditions that result in a system upset, the added investment can mean fewer repairs, less downtime and smoother operations in the long run.
Choose solutions the local workforce and commercial ecosystem can build and support. Resilient design doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Even the best technologies must align with real-world constraints like material availability, labor capacity and evolving FAA guidance. Selecting emergency system components that aren’t produced domestically can impact your resiliency plan when parts and technical support are half a world away. Sourcing specialty materials in the right quantities — and finding local crews trained to install them — can be a challenge. If an airport needs a particular oil for asphalt or aggregate not available locally, shipping adds cost and potential delays. Likewise, materials marketed as “green” or ultradurable can present constructability issues or be unfamiliar to the local workforce.
Remember, more options ≠ better outcomes. Most airport leaders don’t have the time — or the technical background — to parse complex risk scenarios. That’s why they depend on their engineering partners not just for skills and experience, but also for guidance they can trust. Offering a range of options may seem helpful, but successful projects are often shaped by clear, data-backed recommendations. Engineers aren’t just there to offer opinions — they’re there to help owners cut through the noise and make smart, long-term decisions.