There is an art to conducting contract negotiations and emerging with a reasonable plan. Clearly establishing and agreeing upon project scope is nearly as important for successful outcomes as risk management.
Ideally, scoping conversations should be a collaboration between the owner and the consultant. The owner understands operational needs and brings the vision to the table. The consultant may be able to recommend ways to achieve the objectives, based on experience and diverse insights, that the client may not have considered. A true partnership can unlock efficiencies and minimize costly revisions later in the project life cycle.
Begin at the End
The work begins with the owner’s vision: the overall goal, the necessary deadline, any specific requirements. This end state is the pinnacle being built toward.
Consultants take that target and develop the road map of milestones and deliverables that will stack up to attain the ultimate goal. Pairing this with collaborative communication, a good partner will understand the end state and break it into bite-sized pieces for effective execution.
This process of defining scope and segmenting the approach is critical because every project is different. Even among similar projects that must meet matching codes and regulations, there will be nuances or local functional requirements that make each effort unique. Differing authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs) or third-party review requirements can also introduce variation.
Open, collaborative communications help everyone understand where the project is going from the outset.
Get Set in Charrettes
Before embarking on a detailed fee proposal for the full scope of services — especially when the full road map is not yet delineated — it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive programming and conceptual design study. By participating in a charrette, a planning meeting in which all stakeholders come together to capture the vision, values and ideas, and developing a conceptual design report, stakeholders and representatives from multiple disciplines can reach a clearly defined agreement on the scope, budget and schedule at the earliest stages of the project.
Once the owner provides the end goal — such as an airline wanting a new hangar in place by a specific date because of airport leasing needs — the team is able to work backward, building in time for construction, which is preceded by time for permitting, design and so forth. Clear understanding of the scope of what the project will need is likely to dictate permit requirements, equipment orders and more.
After running through the owner’s list of needs, the team can develop a preliminary layout and ask how well it matches what was envisioned. The consultant can use that initial layout to engage in discussions: more of one feature, less of another, perhaps a different configuration. Talking through those variables early on lets the team work through the implications of each for the scope, as well as trickle-down effects into schedule and cost.
Having a multidisciplinary team — potentially including environmental, water and transportation professionals — in the charrette provides extra insights into the implications, resulting in a stronger final plan built on more exacting estimates.